|dc.description.abstract||Facade and urban landscape, the dominant figure in the body of the city and containing the first messages
in urbanism in the citizens’ outlook, has been a place of dialogue especially from the half of last century.
The recognition of this theme its complex due to its’ close relationship with issue of identity and character
of the city, and its’ scope was expanded with the beginning of the modern age and non-conventional
management practices based on the law on urban development. In our society, urban landscape and face
as a part of the country’s contemporary architecture conflict became as one of central focus of dialogue
despite the specific cultural orientation of the system especially after the revolution and growth of
population and urbanization share, war reconstructions, a massive expansion of cities in response to
immigrant settlers and the expansion of higher education.
* According to the purposes intended in this article, the method used in data collection method has been
Library method and studying written documents. The content was analyzed using inductive reasoning
method after data systematic and accurate foundation theoretical collection a and design of building
facades in the old contexts of the city described.
* The vulnerability of city spaces in front of inappropriate facades, in the design of buildings it should
generally be noted that facades of buildings should be able to express the volume inside the building in
addition to solidarity with public spaces.
* So methodical design of facade and paying attention to ’riginality and beauty give the city identity and
reduces the chaos of the city and thus turbulence of the people of city. This process leads to reconciliation
of people with urban spaces and on the other hand prevents their remoteness from such places.||tr_TR