• Home
  • About
  • Policies
  • Contact
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
Advanced Search
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi / Faculty of Letters and Sciences
  • Psikoloji / Psychology
  • Bildiriler, Kongreler ve Sempozyumlar / Declarations, Congresses and Symposiums
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi / Faculty of Letters and Sciences
  • Psikoloji / Psychology
  • Bildiriler, Kongreler ve Sempozyumlar / Declarations, Congresses and Symposiums
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Effects of Explicit Knowledge and Metacognitive Thoughts on Iowa Gambling Task

Thumbnail
View/Open
Effects of Explicit Knowledge and Metacognitive Thoughts on Iowa Gambling Task.pdf (289.1Kb)
Author
Şandor, Serra
Ermiş, Ece Naz
Type
conferenceObject
Date
2017
Language
en_US
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Decision-making is an essential cognitive function in everyday life. The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) is a popular neuropsychological task that assesses decision-making through reward and punishment in the context of learning from past experiences. Differences in decision-making performances of healthy participants predicted by metacognition levels and having explicit knowledge during IGT were examined. 76 female and 12 male students at İstanbul Kultur University completed the IGT and Metacognition Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30). After completing task implementations, each participant was asked a list of questions relating to their strategy on IGT and categorized into two groups depending on their level of explicit knowledge. As in conventional analysis of IGT, each block's net score was calculated. Results indicated that group with knowledge had significantly higher net scores and consistently improved their performances across 5 blocks of IGT than group with no explicit knowledge. Study showed there is a difference between healthy controls' learning strategies and this difference reflected to their decisionmaking performances. In risky blocks of IGT as the task progresses, negative beliefs about uncontrollability and danger subscale scores of metacognition has a negative effect on advantageous decision making, whilst a higher score on cognitive confidence subscale predicts disadvantageous decision making. Results and suggestions for future studies were discussed in light of previous work.
Subject
Iowa Gambling Task
Decision-Making
Metacognition
URI
https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.01.02.2
https://hdl.handle.net/11413/4584
Collections
  • Bildiriler, Kongreler ve Sempozyumlar / Declarations, Congresses and Symposiums [44]

İstanbul Kültür University

Hakkında |Politika | Kütüphane | İletişim | Send Feedback | Admin

Istanbul Kültür University, Ataköy Campus E5 Karayolu Üzeri Bakırköy 34158, İstanbul / TURKEY
Copyright © İstanbul Kültür University

Creative Commons Lisansı
IKU Institutional Repository, Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

Designed by  UNIREPOS

İKU Kütüphane


Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageBy PublisherRightsPubmedScopusWoSThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageBy PublisherRightsPubmedScopusWoS

My Account

Login

İstanbul Kültür University

Hakkında |Politika | Kütüphane | İletişim | Send Feedback | Admin

Istanbul Kültür University, Ataköy Campus E5 Karayolu Üzeri Bakırköy 34158, İstanbul / TURKEY
Copyright © İstanbul Kültür University

Creative Commons Lisansı
IKU Institutional Repository, Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

Designed by  UNIREPOS